Shout at Me | Dallas Stars | Privacy Policy | Advertise Here
     
 
 Razor via RSS
For those of you who Googled off-course
I missed the part about the steady employment being more important than being fascinating
Read More
Or, if you prefer it, Eargasms
Read More
My gift to your self improvement exploits.. Ghandi-Razor-Tony Robbins, in that order
Read More
Old blogs that probably weren't worth reading on the dates they were actually posted
Read More
Your chance to tell me just how fascinating you find me and my thoughts
Shout Out
A picture can be worth a thousand words. I hope so because i can't type more than 11 words per minute
Read More
 

INTENT

 

I love the slight absolution of responsibility that the league has afforded its officials by allowing them to state they “intended” to blow their whistle and stop play dead. Love it because the kinetic, chaotic nature of the sport makes their job beyond difficult, bordering on the impossible – even with 4 of them ruling on things.

That said, it creates some frustrations (see Detroit Red Wings Wednesday) and what if everyone involved were given this same latitude. Could you imagine?

Goalies:

“I intended to make the save”, well then, no goal.

Forwards:

  • “I intended to score” – it’s a goal then.
  • “I intended to keep my stick down” – ok, no penalty then.
  • “I intended to avoid the goalie” – so, no penalty, count the goal.

Coach:

“I intended to win” – two points for you

Defenseman:

  • “I intended to keep the puck in the rink” – no penalty there.
  • “I intended to clear the rebound” – no goal against then.

Network Broadcasters:

“We intended to broadcast the action to you” – good enough for me

Fans:

“We intended to come” (This would work well in Phoenix)

Owners:

“I intended to pay them”

I could go on, but digress.

 

Posted on November 20, 2009 02:13 PM   Email Razor   

Send this article to a friend
Enter recipient's email address:


Your email address:


Message (optional):